Green Design Essay Example for Free

Green target EssayThe notion of a responsible computer architecture use is something that flourished modal value back in 1970s. However, kibibyte builds during that time were only developed on a domestic or small scale nates (Papanek 4). It is only in the late 1980s that honey oil commercial developments are done as an work not only of the 1980 economic boom but as well as of various social, political and design factors (Beaufoy 199). At the present age, the author argues that the attempts of modern architecture to merge new trends in office design and environmental friendly features are primarily commercial in nature and not really fully environmental. Having such(prenominal)(prenominal) premise in mind, the author formulated the research nous Should interior designers encourage clients to go with atomic number 19 design? In order to sufficiently answer this question, the author lose provided a comparative abridgment of the pros and cons of the verdure design and t hen satisfyingly deduce based from the said arguments the writers office weather he will respond to the question on the affirmative or the negative manner.Arguments on the affirmative side claims that (1) The kB design will serve well reduce the environmental burdens that the present nine lends to the aforementioned and also succor man conserve vitality (Winter 8) and (2) The kelvin design will help to minimize or to an extent prevent sickness that are acquired within a particular structure or house. On the other hand, the arguments on the negative side are the following (1) The green design raises the costs in erecting grammatical constructions or houses (2) The green design is difficult to implement on genuine states, depending on the statutory laws governing a particular state.Body The body of the research elaborates on the ordained and the downsides of implementing green design. Reducing Environmental Burdens and Energy Conservation The relevance of green buildings on a globose level and its effect to the environment and energy conservation is one of the study arguments in terms of promoting green designs. Buildings or houses that are tailored to be such are expected to reduce carbon dioxide and chlorofluorocarbon emissions that are brought about by airconditioning (Beaufoy 203).For instance, IBM has been creating buildings that are completely asbestos free and avoids the use of hardwoods unless the latter came from a sustainable source. They are also using low ozone-depleting chemicals and has been controlling the ozone emission of their airconditioning, and even planning in the adjacent future to eliminate aircondition altogether. In some instances, where green buildings use glass on the exterior, such helps to diminish the need for heating, and the small amount of heat that is needed could be gas-fired.Corollary with this, one can also help to reduce the use of light bulbs of fluorescent lights, hence conserving energy (Beaufoy 203). Th e use of energy efficient devices such as those of modern HVAC devices helps buildings to conserve operating costs and could even make the former eligible for rebates offered by local energy companies. In addition with this, through designing building facilities that make use of energy through natural ventilation and daylight also reduces operating costs (Meyerson 47). Health BenefitsOne of the major premises why green buildings are favorable is due to the health benefits that it could bring to people. For instance if a building is designed to draw air at a high level, cooled and the filtered, the air conditioning or water system of the aforementioned could help eliminate the risk of Legionnaires Disease (Beaufoy 203). The Greenpeace building in Islington, capital of the United Kingdom are also geared towards creating a more environmentally sustained building in their disposition to reduce the risks of office illnesses that result due to the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) emissions of a irconditions (Beaufoy 204).Increased Construction and Soft lives The veritable costs of building green architecture are something that is too expensive that a lot of green features can not be really accommodated by most marginalized companies (Johnston 1). As such it is often argued that green buildings are only for wealthy people (Wilson 1). The problem of first costs or the initial expenses that has to be paid prior to building a house is something that is of a growing concern for customers. For instance, the use of unique trades and materials could increase costs in addition to LEED commissioning (Syphers et al 8).In addition with this, higher leisurely costs are also most likely to be incurred in green buildings. The use of additive design analysis, computer modeling, commissioning, product research and lifecycle costs analysis for materials that could be substituted could also paved the way for up-front costs (Syphers et al 8). Legal Considerations Local conditions that ar e unique to e rattling country and state refrigerated also be one of the problems in terms of attempting to erect green buildings, for some state regulations could nark certain problems on the aforementioned.For instance, the state of California prohibits the use of water-free urinals that could have saved certain buildings a significant amount of water (Syphers et al 6). In relation with this, the use of solar panels that could have help buildings to save electricity, though highly encouraged within various states regulations also poses some problems as the law requires buildings to square off these panels somewhere that could not be visualisen on public roads due to the risk of accidents.Also, local building codes have given limitations on the height windmills including its zone restrictions (Syphers et al 7). As generally known, windmills are also one of the most environmentally friendly way of generating electricity. Analysis After presenting the abovementioned arguments of the positive and the downsides of the use of the green design, it is also noteworthy to tell that amidst all of these most basic issues, the author perceived that the advocacy for the edition of green buildings is something that is primarily commercial in nature rather than really environmental in focus.Although it could be significantly noted that green buildings indeed helps the environment due to cutting the use of certain machines that could have harmed for instance the ozone layer, it could be implied that the primary motivation of customers is indeed on cost cutting and juxtaposed with that of course of instruction is a relatively healthy lifestyle.In this respect, it could be said that although the positive side of green architecture is emphasized most specially its environmental underpinnings, the fact couldnt be hidden that such an elbow grease is not really one hundred percent pro nature as one could see a compromise between capitalism and protecting the environment. It is with this respect that the author remembered that capitalism is indeed a necessary evil. There are a number of human endeavors that will not proceed without its aid, and such includes even the environment.In addition to these issues, the notion of the difficulty of implementing the architectural design of green buildings is something that should also be taken into consideration. The initial construction costs and soft costs could be really expensive however, experts notwithstanding argue that the life cycle costs of the building in the long run could be very cost effective (California Integrated shoot a line Management Board 1). The legal considerations of course are something that is self-assertive in order to assure order and efficiency to the society.Albeit it should be noted that the process of adopting green design is something that is still in the process of development hence it is theoretically possible that the future technology could bring about changes that could fu lly actualize the fullest utility of the program. Conclusion Given the abovementioned factors, the author wishes to answer the research question Should interior designers encourage clients to go with green design? in the affirmative.It could be seen that although the green design has a number of short comings, it could not be denied that these flaws are only minute in comparison to the boilers suit utility that it could bring to man and to the environment. The short comings of green design could be solved through brisk collaboration of various stakeholders that are concerned to such like customers, contractors, architects, interior designers, engineers, the government, non government organizations, private corporations and the likes.lit Cited Beaufoy, Helena. Case Study The Green Office in Britain A Critical Analysis. Journal of visualize History 6,3 (1993) 206. California Integrated Waste Management Board. January 2007. Sustainable (Green) Building Project Design Cost Issues. 2 3 October 2007 http//www. ciwmb. ca. gov/GreenBuilding/Design/CostIssues. htmPrimers Johnston, Ritchey. Actual Costs Is Building Green Too Expensive? January 2000.Housing Zone. 23 October 2007 http//www. housingzone. com/topics/nahb/green/nhb00ca029. asp Meyerson, Andrew. The Dollars and Cents of Green Construction Being Environmentally Friendly Brings Financial as thoroughly as brotherly Benefits. Journal of Accountancy 199,5 (2005) 47. Papanek, Victor. Design for the Real World Human environmental science and Social Change. London Thames Hudson, 1985. Syphers, Geof et al. October 2003 Managing the Cost of Green Buildings K-12 Public Schools Research Laboratories Public Libraries Multi-family Affordable Housing. State of California and Almeda COunty Waste Management Authority.23 October 2007 http//www. ciwmb. ca. gov/GreenBuilding/Design/ManagingCost. pdf Winter, Metta, The Greening of Design Jack Elliott Believes Interior Designers Can and Should Play a Major Role in Preve nting Environmental Degradation, That Sustainability Should Be Central to All Design Decisions. Human Ecology 30,1 (2002) 8. Wilson, Alex. Building Green on a Budget. May 1999. Building Green. com. 23 October 2007 http//www. buildinggreen. com/auth/article. cfm? fileName=080501a. xmla